cine ad

6 Movies That Are Better Than The Books They're Based On

6 Movies That Are Better Than The Books They're Based On

Just about every movie buff has heard this phrase uttered (if they didn’t say it themselves) by someone, “The movie was good...but the book was better.”  Since books have significantly more time to cover character development and a deep story, there are many people who think this is always the case.  Because of that, I’ve come up with the 6 movies that were actually better than the books.

Books have always been a hot property for filmmakers; dating all the way back to Gone With The Wind.  And with the final Harry Potter and Twilight Films just on the horizon, along with the start of production on another hot book series (Hunger Games), books seem to be hotter than ever. 

*Note, these choices are limited to the books I have actually read*

Clockwork Orange

A Clockwork Orange (1971)

Stanley Kubrick’s masterful film was an obvious choice for me.  It managed to create some of the most iconic moments in film history, and despite the intense amount of controversy when it came out, is now a staple for movie buffs and filmmakers alike.  

The movie managed to highlight all of the great themes of the book, yet none of the confusion.  Don’t get me wrong, Anthony Burgess’ novel about teen violence, was well written and a though-provoking read....if you could get through it.  The dialogue is highly inventive and one of the greater aspects of his writing style, but it’s a pain to get through (especially at the beginning).

But even when you get past the verbiage, the themes get mucked up in some of the eccentricities of the surroundings and characters.  While it’s worth reading, the movie shaped the story in a far more relatable fashion for a larger audience base.


Jaws (1975)

Jaws has often been credited with being the originator of the ‘Summer Blockbuster’ and with good reason.  People flocked to see this movie back when it was released, and it quite literally had people too afraid to go into the water after seeing it.  

The book was similarly thrilling (seriously, I read it all in one night, starting at 9pm), it did feature quite a bit of unnecessary exposition.  Not that it was bad, but a few of the extraneous plot lines, felt like they were thrown in there to add length to the novel and had no real impact on the outcome of the main story.  

The movie did away with these excessive sub-plots and focused on the most exciting aspect of the book: a freaking massive man-eating shark.  Brilliance and fun ensues from there, and we’re left with a classic that cannot be missed.

Princess Bride

Princess Bride (1987)

I was really on the fence about bringing this film up.  Everyone knows how classic this movie is now, and it’s humor and wit, has proven to be timeless.  Truly, anytime it’s on I’m compelled to watch it, and simply can’t put it down.  

Then I read the book a couple years ago.  I was amazed at how hilarious it was!  I’ve never read a book that had me laughing so hard, and so invested in the characters.  But looking at them both from a distance, the movie just works better.  There are many superfluous moments in the book, and the witty romantic humor from the film, is often more sarcastic and cynical in the book.  

While the book is amazing, and a must-read, the film took all of the best parts of it and managed to improve on them (as it should, since the screenplay was also written by the book’s author).

Forrest Gump

Forrest Gump (1994)

Forrest Gump was such an incredible film and managed to snap Tom Hanks another Oscar.  It was a fun romp through history, in which we got to see some of the most important historical instances from the viewpoint of a well-meaning (but overall naive) man.  It was funny, witty, dramatic, and hit all the right notes.

Almost none of that was present in the book.  Well, to a degree it was.  The book is pretty hilarious, but doesn’t feature all of the cohesion and depth that the movie managed to bring to the story.  It doesn’t make you feel as much for the character, so much as make you laugh at what happens to him.

It’s a funny read, with a sequel that’s even more outrageous, but the movie far-exceeded everything the book was trying for.


Congo (1995)

Michael Crichton is one of my all time favorite authors.  I’ve gobbled up everything he’s ever written, and his stories are ones I continue to come back to time and time again.  It’s no wonder, that nearly every single book he’s ever written has been turned into a movie (the 4 non-fiction ones aside).  More than that, just about all of his movie adaptations were some of the biggest blockbusters around.  

So it hurts me (just a little) to list Congo on here.  In truth, I think it’s easily the worst book Crichton ever wrote.  It’s just boring.  The most exciting moments are around the middle of the book, and basically, that’s what they seemed to base the movie on.  The rest of the book just went too deep into the science part of it, and left out all the fun.  

While I wouldn’t say the movie has aged very well, it’s still a fun flick to watch, when there’s nothing else going on.  It’s got plenty of action, a fast-paced story, and monkey actors before motion capture became the norm.  What’s not to love?


Twilight (2008-2012)

As much as I hate to bring this up...I have to.  Don’t get me wrong here, I cannot stand these movies, and I’ve actually tried (I promise), but since this list is about films that are better than their books, I need to bring it up.  

As bad as the movies are (in my mind), the books are far worse.  Seriously, I picked them up to see what all the craze was about, and these are some of the most poorly written things I’ve ever read...and I’ve had to read quite a bit of crap being and editor.  

In the first book alone, there are entire chapters dedicated to following every little detail of Bella’s day, even down to the snacks she freaking ate!  Nothing else happened in the chapter, nothing important to the plot came out of it, it was just there.  It was drull, boring, and I don’t know how it ever got published.  That being said, the movies are far better by comparison, by actually providing a decent pacing, and some action as well.

Hunger Games

On the whole, I’m typically one of those people who believe the books are better than the films, but there are instances (obviously) where that isn’t the case.  Overall, I always like to try and do both.  If it’s a good story, why not revisit it?   As far as the upcoming movies, all fans can do is cross their fingers and hope they can live up to the grand legacy their book counter-parts established.